<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (3) TMI 36 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9222</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the payment made by the assessee towards the loss incurred by a managed company was legally obligatory and a deductible business expense. The Court determined that the payment was made for commercial expediency and to preserve the business interests of the assessee, qualifying it as a business expense. The Court allowed the deduction, subject to verification of the loss claimed, ruling in favor of the assessee against the department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (3) TMI 36 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9222</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the payment made by the assessee towards the loss incurred by a managed company was legally obligatory and a deductible business expense. The Court determined that the payment was made for commercial expediency and to preserve the business interests of the assessee, qualifying it as a business expense. The Court allowed the deduction, subject to verification of the loss claimed, ruling in favor of the assessee against the department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>