<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 761 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345649</link>
    <description>The judgment upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, emphasizing the binding nature of Circulars and supporting the retrospective application of the amended limitation period for refund claims. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the case was directed to be considered on merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 761 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345649</link>
      <description>The judgment upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision, emphasizing the binding nature of Circulars and supporting the retrospective application of the amended limitation period for refund claims. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, and the case was directed to be considered on merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>