https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345648 The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for redetermination regarding the denial of Cenvat Credit refund, emphasizing the need for compliance with procedural requirements and consideration of interest on delayed refunds. The appellant's appeal against the rejection of a significant refund amount was partially allowed, directing a fresh decision based on the submission of necessary documents. Disputes over the eligibility of certain services as input services for Cenvat Credit led to a re-examination order with the submission of supporting documents. The Tribunal stressed adherence to legal precedents and case laws in reaching its decision for a fresh determination. en-us Thu, 06 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Jul 2017 09:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345648 The Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for redetermination regarding the denial of Cenvat Credit refund, emphasizing the need for compliance with procedural requirements and consideration of interest on delayed refunds. The appellant's appeal against the rejection of a significant refund amount was partially allowed, directing a fresh decision based on the submission of necessary documents. Disputes over the eligibility of certain services as input services for Cenvat Credit led to a re-examination order with the submission of supporting documents. The Tribunal stressed adherence to legal precedents and case laws in reaching its decision for a fresh determination. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 06 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345648