<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (10) TMI 7 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9213</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the sums of Rs. 1,000 and Rs. 10,348 for the assessment year 1966-67 and Rs. 2,375 and Rs. 12,375 for the assessment year 1965-66 should not be included in the total income of the Hindu undivided family (HUF). The Court determined that these amounts were remuneration for the personal services of the karta and should be treated as his individual income. The decision favored the assessee, and the Court awarded costs and an advocate&#039;s fee of Rs. 250.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (10) TMI 7 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9213</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the sums of Rs. 1,000 and Rs. 10,348 for the assessment year 1966-67 and Rs. 2,375 and Rs. 12,375 for the assessment year 1965-66 should not be included in the total income of the Hindu undivided family (HUF). The Court determined that these amounts were remuneration for the personal services of the karta and should be treated as his individual income. The decision favored the assessee, and the Court awarded costs and an advocate&#039;s fee of Rs. 250.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>