<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 740 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345628</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that expenses exceeding 6% of liability of Mutual Fund companies should be allowed, as per statutory provisions. Additionally, IT infrastructure expenses were deemed permissible as separate expenses, consistent with previous assessment years. The Appeal was dismissed, with no costs awarded, and the Assessee&#039;s counsel withdrew the Notice of Motion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 740 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345628</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that expenses exceeding 6% of liability of Mutual Fund companies should be allowed, as per statutory provisions. Additionally, IT infrastructure expenses were deemed permissible as separate expenses, consistent with previous assessment years. The Appeal was dismissed, with no costs awarded, and the Assessee&#039;s counsel withdrew the Notice of Motion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>