https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345624 The Tribunal found that the appellant's repeated trading of shares was indicative of a trading intention for quick profits rather than capital gains. The Tribunal's decision, based on evaluating the facts of each case, determined that the shares were held as stock in trade. Both the Commissioner and the Tribunal agreed on this factual finding, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs as no substantial question of law arose. en-us Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Jul 2017 08:26:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345624 The Tribunal found that the appellant's repeated trading of shares was indicative of a trading intention for quick profits rather than capital gains. The Tribunal's decision, based on evaluating the facts of each case, determined that the shares were held as stock in trade. Both the Commissioner and the Tribunal agreed on this factual finding, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs as no substantial question of law arose. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345624