<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 721 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345609</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) confirmed the demand and penalties under Sections 77 and 78, while deleting the penalty under Section 76. The Tribunal set aside the balance demand, remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for redetermination after providing the appellant with an opportunity to be heard and present evidence. The Tribunal upheld penalties under Sections 77 and 78, directing the appellant to appear for a hearing. The appeal was partially allowed and remanded for further proceedings, emphasizing due process. The Tribunal conducted an ex-parte hearing due to the appellant&#039;s absence, ultimately remanding the matter for reconsideration and a fair review by the Adjudicating Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jul 2017 10:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 721 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345609</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) confirmed the demand and penalties under Sections 77 and 78, while deleting the penalty under Section 76. The Tribunal set aside the balance demand, remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for redetermination after providing the appellant with an opportunity to be heard and present evidence. The Tribunal upheld penalties under Sections 77 and 78, directing the appellant to appear for a hearing. The appeal was partially allowed and remanded for further proceedings, emphasizing due process. The Tribunal conducted an ex-parte hearing due to the appellant&#039;s absence, ultimately remanding the matter for reconsideration and a fair review by the Adjudicating Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>