<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 713 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345601</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, clarifying that Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 did not apply to the reversal of Cenvat credit on waste batteries used in manufacturing Dry Battery Cells. Since waste batteries were not exempted from duty payment, the appellant was not obligated to reverse the credit. The tribunal referenced past decisions and set aside the demand for credit reversal on waste batteries, ultimately allowing the appeals in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 713 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345601</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, clarifying that Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 did not apply to the reversal of Cenvat credit on waste batteries used in manufacturing Dry Battery Cells. Since waste batteries were not exempted from duty payment, the appellant was not obligated to reverse the credit. The tribunal referenced past decisions and set aside the demand for credit reversal on waste batteries, ultimately allowing the appeals in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345601</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>