https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345598 The judgment allowed Appeal Nos.E/41888 & 41889/2016 entirely, confirming the admissibility of Cenvat credit for Motor Vehicle Insurance and Vehicle Maintenance Charges before 01.04.2011. For the post-amendment period, the denial of credit was upheld, with interest liability subject to verification and the penalty set aside due to the appellant's lack of malafide intent. Appeal No.E/41890/2016 was disposed of by confirming the denial of credit, remanding for interest verification, and setting aside the penalty, based on a thorough analysis of the eligibility of input services for Cenvat credit. en-us Wed, 17 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Jul 2017 08:22:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345598 The judgment allowed Appeal Nos.E/41888 & 41889/2016 entirely, confirming the admissibility of Cenvat credit for Motor Vehicle Insurance and Vehicle Maintenance Charges before 01.04.2011. For the post-amendment period, the denial of credit was upheld, with interest liability subject to verification and the penalty set aside due to the appellant's lack of malafide intent. Appeal No.E/41890/2016 was disposed of by confirming the denial of credit, remanding for interest verification, and setting aside the penalty, based on a thorough analysis of the eligibility of input services for Cenvat credit. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 17 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345598