<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (5) TMI 43 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193275</link>
    <description>Section 42(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 permits non-resident income arising through a business connection to be assessed either in the non-resident&#039;s name or through its resident agent. The provision operates as a tax-collection mechanism, with the agent&#039;s vicarious liability linked to control over the business connection and safeguards for retention and recovery from the non-resident&#039;s assets. This assessment choice is treated as guided by the statutory scheme rather than arbitrary discretion and is not regarded as violating equality or business-freedom protections. Assessment in the non-resident principal&#039;s name through the resident agent remains valid, and purchasing operations undertaken by the statutory agent fall within the relevant statutory concept under section 42(3).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 15:36:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (5) TMI 43 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193275</link>
      <description>Section 42(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 permits non-resident income arising through a business connection to be assessed either in the non-resident&#039;s name or through its resident agent. The provision operates as a tax-collection mechanism, with the agent&#039;s vicarious liability linked to control over the business connection and safeguards for retention and recovery from the non-resident&#039;s assets. This assessment choice is treated as guided by the statutory scheme rather than arbitrary discretion and is not regarded as violating equality or business-freedom protections. Assessment in the non-resident principal&#039;s name through the resident agent remains valid, and purchasing operations undertaken by the statutory agent fall within the relevant statutory concept under section 42(3).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>