<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1957 (5) TMI 43 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193275</link>
    <description>Section 42(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 is explained as a machinery provision for taxing income arising through a business connection with a non-resident and for enabling collection through the agent where direct recovery is difficult. The provision is described as valid because the choice to assess the non-resident or the agent follows the statutory scheme and creates vicarious liability linked to the business connection, without arbitrary discrimination or an unreasonable restriction on business. The notes also state that assessment in the non-resident&#039;s name, through resident agents, does not invalidate proceedings, and that purchasing operations carried on by the statutory agent fall within section 42(3).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 15:36:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1957 (5) TMI 43 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193275</link>
      <description>Section 42(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 is explained as a machinery provision for taxing income arising through a business connection with a non-resident and for enabling collection through the agent where direct recovery is difficult. The provision is described as valid because the choice to assess the non-resident or the agent follows the statutory scheme and creates vicarious liability linked to the business connection, without arbitrary discrimination or an unreasonable restriction on business. The notes also state that assessment in the non-resident&#039;s name, through resident agents, does not invalidate proceedings, and that purchasing operations carried on by the statutory agent fall within section 42(3).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 1957 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>