<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (12) TMI 191 - High Court Of Andhra Pradesh</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193268</link>
    <description>The court held that the extension of time for issuing a show cause notice without affording the affected person an opportunity was invalid. The court emphasized the connection between seizure and confiscation, ruling that confiscation cannot occur without seizure. The court quashed the orders of the Deputy Collector and the Collector of Excise, directing the return of the seized articles. The writ appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 12:30:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (12) TMI 191 - High Court Of Andhra Pradesh</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193268</link>
      <description>The court held that the extension of time for issuing a show cause notice without affording the affected person an opportunity was invalid. The court emphasized the connection between seizure and confiscation, ruling that confiscation cannot occur without seizure. The court quashed the orders of the Deputy Collector and the Collector of Excise, directing the return of the seized articles. The writ appeal was dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>