<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Dispute Over Turnover Tax: Petitioner Challenges ETO&#039;s Claim of In-State Sales Under PVAT Act, 2005.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35565</link>
    <description>Levy of turnover tax - inter state sale - PVAT Ac, 2005 - according to the ETO, the petitioner sold the goods in the State of Punjab and that the sales were not inter-state sales as contended by the petitioner. This was a fundamental error - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:21:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:21:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Dispute Over Turnover Tax: Petitioner Challenges ETO&#039;s Claim of In-State Sales Under PVAT Act, 2005.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35565</link>
      <description>Levy of turnover tax - inter state sale - PVAT Ac, 2005 - according to the ETO, the petitioner sold the goods in the State of Punjab and that the sales were not inter-state sales as contended by the petitioner. This was a fundamental error - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2017 10:21:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=35565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>