<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 687 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345575</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the activities of installing and commissioning pressure shaft liners fell under &quot;Works Contract Service&quot; (WCS) rather than &quot;Erection, Commissioning or Installation service&quot; (ECIS). It was held that the activities were not taxable before 01.06.2007 and were excluded from service tax under Section 65(105)(zzzza) of the Finance Act, 1994. Penalties imposed were set aside, and a refund of Rs. 28,06,915/- was granted as the activities were found to be non-taxable. The tribunal emphasized proper classification under WCS and exclusion from service tax for works related to tunnels and dams.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2018 15:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 687 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345575</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the activities of installing and commissioning pressure shaft liners fell under &quot;Works Contract Service&quot; (WCS) rather than &quot;Erection, Commissioning or Installation service&quot; (ECIS). It was held that the activities were not taxable before 01.06.2007 and were excluded from service tax under Section 65(105)(zzzza) of the Finance Act, 1994. Penalties imposed were set aside, and a refund of Rs. 28,06,915/- was granted as the activities were found to be non-taxable. The tribunal emphasized proper classification under WCS and exclusion from service tax for works related to tunnels and dams.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>