<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 685 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345573</link>
    <description>Service tax on renting of immovable property was accepted for the normal period, but the extended period and penalties were not invocable because the statutory bodies&#039; records did not show suppression or wilful misstatement with intent to evade tax. Interest remained applicable for the surviving demand. Amounts collected purely as advertisement tax were held not to be consideration for a taxable service, but receipts that were in substance for sale of space or time for advertisement could still fall within the taxable category. The advertisement-tax issue was therefore remanded for fresh factual verification to determine the true character of the receipts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 685 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345573</link>
      <description>Service tax on renting of immovable property was accepted for the normal period, but the extended period and penalties were not invocable because the statutory bodies&#039; records did not show suppression or wilful misstatement with intent to evade tax. Interest remained applicable for the surviving demand. Amounts collected purely as advertisement tax were held not to be consideration for a taxable service, but receipts that were in substance for sale of space or time for advertisement could still fall within the taxable category. The advertisement-tax issue was therefore remanded for fresh factual verification to determine the true character of the receipts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>