https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345571 The appeal was dismissed as the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims. The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, finding no errors in the factual or legal appreciation of the case. The appellant's failure to maintain separate input accounts and utilize credits without following the required rules led to the rejection of their appeal. The decision was based on the lack of proof regarding the exclusive use of certain phones for taxable services, supporting the lower authorities' findings and resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. en-us Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Jul 2017 08:44:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345571 The appeal was dismissed as the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims. The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, finding no errors in the factual or legal appreciation of the case. The appellant's failure to maintain separate input accounts and utilize credits without following the required rules led to the rejection of their appeal. The decision was based on the lack of proof regarding the exclusive use of certain phones for taxable services, supporting the lower authorities' findings and resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345571