https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345570 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI ruled in favor of the Revenue, allowing their appeal against an order confirming taxes for 'business auxiliary service' and services by 'commission agents' under section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal directed a reevaluation of the tax amount for 2006-07 due to discrepancies in taxable services value and tax rates, emphasizing compliance with penalty provisions. The matter was remanded for accurate computation and imposition of taxes and penalties in accordance with legal requirements, stressing the importance of proper tax assessment and adherence to statutory provisions. en-us Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Jul 2017 08:44:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345570 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI ruled in favor of the Revenue, allowing their appeal against an order confirming taxes for 'business auxiliary service' and services by 'commission agents' under section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal directed a reevaluation of the tax amount for 2006-07 due to discrepancies in taxable services value and tax rates, emphasizing compliance with penalty provisions. The matter was remanded for accurate computation and imposition of taxes and penalties in accordance with legal requirements, stressing the importance of proper tax assessment and adherence to statutory provisions. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345570