<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (5) TMI 16 - High Court Of Madras</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193249</link>
    <description>Section 28 of the Income-tax Act, 1922 falls within the Central Legislature&#039;s power to tax income, including ancillary anti-evasion measures and penalties for concealment or inaccurate particulars. Its penalty regime does not violate article 14 merely because prosecution may also arise: penalty is remedial and compensatory, whereas prosecution is punitive, and the statutory bar on prosecution after penalty is a concession. Penalty proceedings may continue after assessment is completed if initiated while assessment proceedings were pending, because the final assessment determines the penalty quantum. Penalty levies initiated in time were therefore legally sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2017 12:15:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (5) TMI 16 - High Court Of Madras</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193249</link>
      <description>Section 28 of the Income-tax Act, 1922 falls within the Central Legislature&#039;s power to tax income, including ancillary anti-evasion measures and penalties for concealment or inaccurate particulars. Its penalty regime does not violate article 14 merely because prosecution may also arise: penalty is remedial and compensatory, whereas prosecution is punitive, and the statutory bar on prosecution after penalty is a concession. Penalty proceedings may continue after assessment is completed if initiated while assessment proceedings were pending, because the final assessment determines the penalty quantum. Penalty levies initiated in time were therefore legally sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>