<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1221 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193245</link>
    <description>The impugned order was set aside, and the matter remanded for verification of credit reversal and interest payment. If the appellant&#039;s claims were validated, the proceedings would be closed, and penalties reduced. The decision underscored the importance of complying with cenvat credit rules and the need for accurate segregation of credit for different activities to avoid penalties and ensure legal compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 18:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1221 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193245</link>
      <description>The impugned order was set aside, and the matter remanded for verification of credit reversal and interest payment. If the appellant&#039;s claims were validated, the proceedings would be closed, and penalties reduced. The decision underscored the importance of complying with cenvat credit rules and the need for accurate segregation of credit for different activities to avoid penalties and ensure legal compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>