<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (12) TMI 10 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9178</link>
    <description>Gift-tax paid cannot be recovered as money paid under a mistake of law where the taxpayers had protested the levy from the outset, knew the legal position, and nevertheless did not pursue the available statutory rectification and revision remedies within time. The Gujarat HC held that a later Supreme Court ruling did not retrospectively convert those payments into refundable payments under the general law. It further held that writ jurisdiction should not be used as a substitute for the missed statutory remedies, and that unexplained delay and non-exhaustion of the prescribed machinery were fatal. The petitions were therefore rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (12) TMI 10 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9178</link>
      <description>Gift-tax paid cannot be recovered as money paid under a mistake of law where the taxpayers had protested the levy from the outset, knew the legal position, and nevertheless did not pursue the available statutory rectification and revision remedies within time. The Gujarat HC held that a later Supreme Court ruling did not retrospectively convert those payments into refundable payments under the general law. It further held that writ jurisdiction should not be used as a substitute for the missed statutory remedies, and that unexplained delay and non-exhaustion of the prescribed machinery were fatal. The petitions were therefore rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>