<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 655 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345543</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals by confirming the application of a 12% net profit rate for estimating business income and deleting the additions of unexplained cash deposits for both assessment years. The Tribunal found that the revenue authorities failed to disprove the explanation provided by the assessee regarding the cash deposits, leading to the deletion of the additions for the respective years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2017 07:37:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 655 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345543</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals by confirming the application of a 12% net profit rate for estimating business income and deleting the additions of unexplained cash deposits for both assessment years. The Tribunal found that the revenue authorities failed to disprove the explanation provided by the assessee regarding the cash deposits, leading to the deletion of the additions for the respective years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>