<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 644 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345532</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to verify if input services were received and used before 1.3.2006 for output services prior to that date. If verified satisfactorily, the appellant should not be denied abatement under Notification No.1/2006-ST for output services post-1.3.2006. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded for further verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2017 07:36:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 644 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345532</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to verify if input services were received and used before 1.3.2006 for output services prior to that date. If verified satisfactorily, the appellant should not be denied abatement under Notification No.1/2006-ST for output services post-1.3.2006. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded for further verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345532</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>