https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345527 The judge set aside the demand for clandestine removal of goods against the appellants, ruling it unsustainable due to lack of evidence linking them to the alleged activities. The imposition of penalties was also overturned. The decision highlighted the importance of direct evidence and procedural requirements under the Central Excise Act, emphasizing the necessity of corroborative evidence in establishing duty evasion allegations. en-us Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Sep 2017 14:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345527 The judge set aside the demand for clandestine removal of goods against the appellants, ruling it unsustainable due to lack of evidence linking them to the alleged activities. The imposition of penalties was also overturned. The decision highlighted the importance of direct evidence and procedural requirements under the Central Excise Act, emphasizing the necessity of corroborative evidence in establishing duty evasion allegations. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345527