https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345517 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the duty had been correctly discharged based on the Fe-content analysis at the time of export. The impugned order demanding additional duty was deemed unsustainable, emphasizing that duty liability should be assessed based on conditions at the time of export, as per statutory provisions. The decision highlighted the importance of adhering to agreed-upon terms at the time of export and accepting departmental laboratory analysis unless challenged, ultimately allowing the appeal with consequential reliefs. en-us Tue, 13 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Jul 2017 07:35:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345517 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the duty had been correctly discharged based on the Fe-content analysis at the time of export. The impugned order demanding additional duty was deemed unsustainable, emphasizing that duty liability should be assessed based on conditions at the time of export, as per statutory provisions. The decision highlighted the importance of adhering to agreed-upon terms at the time of export and accepting departmental laboratory analysis unless challenged, ultimately allowing the appeal with consequential reliefs. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 13 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345517