<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 625 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345513</link>
    <description>Relief for duplicate share certificates depends on the company&#039;s statutory power and proof of loss; where the petitioner failed to produce sufficient evidence of loss and the shares had already been transferred to a third party, such relief was refused. Rectification of the register of members was also unavailable because the dispute turned on disputed title, genuineness of the transfer instrument, and alleged fraud or forgery, all of which require civil adjudication rather than summary rectification proceedings. The transferee was not impleaded, and pending SEBI proceedings and suppression of prior SEBI action further weighed against relief. The petitioner was left to pursue civil remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2017 07:35:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 625 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345513</link>
      <description>Relief for duplicate share certificates depends on the company&#039;s statutory power and proof of loss; where the petitioner failed to produce sufficient evidence of loss and the shares had already been transferred to a third party, such relief was refused. Rectification of the register of members was also unavailable because the dispute turned on disputed title, genuineness of the transfer instrument, and alleged fraud or forgery, all of which require civil adjudication rather than summary rectification proceedings. The transferee was not impleaded, and pending SEBI proceedings and suppression of prior SEBI action further weighed against relief. The petitioner was left to pursue civil remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>