<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 624 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345512</link>
    <description>The 2015 amendment to the Negotiable Instruments Act shifted territorial jurisdiction for Section 138 complaints to the court where the payee&#039;s bank account branch is situated and where the cheque is delivered for collection. The earlier rule linking jurisdiction to the place of dishonour no longer applied after the amendment. A complaint pending before a court lacking jurisdiction under the amended scheme was treated as suffering from a jurisdictional defect and was required to be transferred to the competent court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2017 07:34:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 624 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345512</link>
      <description>The 2015 amendment to the Negotiable Instruments Act shifted territorial jurisdiction for Section 138 complaints to the court where the payee&#039;s bank account branch is situated and where the cheque is delivered for collection. The earlier rule linking jurisdiction to the place of dishonour no longer applied after the amendment. A complaint pending before a court lacking jurisdiction under the amended scheme was treated as suffering from a jurisdictional defect and was required to be transferred to the competent court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>