https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345511 The Court ruled that no coercive action should be taken against advocates, law firms, or LLPs for non-compliance with GST requirements. Legal services remain under the reverse charge mechanism unless providers opt for voluntary registration. The Court sought clarification on the authority to issue press releases modifying GST Council recommendations and the process for such modifications. Additionally, it examined de-registration procedures for lawyers and law firms under the Finance Act, emphasizing compliance with CGST Act provisions for tax benefits, including input tax credit and voluntary registration. en-us Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Mar 2018 12:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345511 The Court ruled that no coercive action should be taken against advocates, law firms, or LLPs for non-compliance with GST requirements. Legal services remain under the reverse charge mechanism unless providers opt for voluntary registration. The Court sought clarification on the authority to issue press releases modifying GST Council recommendations and the process for such modifications. Additionally, it examined de-registration procedures for lawyers and law firms under the Finance Act, emphasizing compliance with CGST Act provisions for tax benefits, including input tax credit and voluntary registration. Case-Laws GST Tue, 18 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345511