<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (4) TMI 25 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9169</link>
    <description>The court ruled that the executors were not assessable under the Wealth-tax Act for the relevant years, had not transitioned to trustees, and could be classified as &#039;individuals&#039; under section 3. The executors were found to still be performing their duties and had not completed their functions as executors. The court cited relevant case law to support its decision. The assessees were granted costs, with counsel&#039;s fee set at Rs. 250.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (4) TMI 25 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9169</link>
      <description>The court ruled that the executors were not assessable under the Wealth-tax Act for the relevant years, had not transitioned to trustees, and could be classified as &#039;individuals&#039; under section 3. The executors were found to still be performing their duties and had not completed their functions as executors. The court cited relevant case law to support its decision. The assessees were granted costs, with counsel&#039;s fee set at Rs. 250.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>