<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (8) TMI 16 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9147</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the violation of natural justice principles in assessment proceedings. The failure to provide adequate opportunity for the assessee to meet the case set up by the department, including lack of witness statements for cross-examination, rendered the proceedings unfair. The court awarded costs to the assessee and assessed the department&#039;s counsel fee at the same amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (8) TMI 16 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9147</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing the violation of natural justice principles in assessment proceedings. The failure to provide adequate opportunity for the assessee to meet the case set up by the department, including lack of witness statements for cross-examination, rendered the proceedings unfair. The court awarded costs to the assessee and assessed the department&#039;s counsel fee at the same amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>