<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 601 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345489</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHANDIGARH due to delays in filing and non-compliance with CESTAT Procedure Rules. The Tribunal found that the delay in filing appeals was not justifiable, and the applications for condonation of delay were not properly authorized as per the rules. The mismatch between the authorized officer and the signatory of the applications led to the dismissal of the appeals. The decision underscores the significance of strict adherence to procedural rules and proper authorization in filing appeals and applications for condonation of delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 601 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345489</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHANDIGARH due to delays in filing and non-compliance with CESTAT Procedure Rules. The Tribunal found that the delay in filing appeals was not justifiable, and the applications for condonation of delay were not properly authorized as per the rules. The mismatch between the authorized officer and the signatory of the applications led to the dismissal of the appeals. The decision underscores the significance of strict adherence to procedural rules and proper authorization in filing appeals and applications for condonation of delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>