<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (10) TMI 32 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9146</link>
    <description>For estate duty valuation, unquoted shares are to be assessed at their open-market value using recognised valuation methods where no special statutory rule applies. The break-up method is a recognised approach, and wealth-tax valuation based on that method may be used as relevant evidence. On that basis, goodwill was not to be separately added because the break-up approach did not contemplate it, and expected dividend was also not includible absent material showing it was properly part of the asset value. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on the wealth-tax valuation was upheld, as there was no material indicating any increase in value after the balance-sheet date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (10) TMI 32 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9146</link>
      <description>For estate duty valuation, unquoted shares are to be assessed at their open-market value using recognised valuation methods where no special statutory rule applies. The break-up method is a recognised approach, and wealth-tax valuation based on that method may be used as relevant evidence. On that basis, goodwill was not to be separately added because the break-up approach did not contemplate it, and expected dividend was also not includible absent material showing it was properly part of the asset value. The Tribunal&#039;s reliance on the wealth-tax valuation was upheld, as there was no material indicating any increase in value after the balance-sheet date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>