https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345483 Exemption from excise duty was held available where goods were cleared under the petitioners' own brand name, because the point had already been finally settled in their favour by binding precedent. The court treated the earlier Supreme Court and Tribunal decisions as conclusive on the brand-name issue within the petitioners' marketing area, and on that basis the show cause notices demanding basic excise duty could not be sustained. The writ petitions succeeded and the notices were quashed. en-us Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Jul 2017 10:19:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345483 Exemption from excise duty was held available where goods were cleared under the petitioners' own brand name, because the point had already been finally settled in their favour by binding precedent. The court treated the earlier Supreme Court and Tribunal decisions as conclusive on the brand-name issue within the petitioners' marketing area, and on that basis the show cause notices demanding basic excise duty could not be sustained. The writ petitions succeeded and the notices were quashed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345483