<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 590 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345478</link>
    <description>Under the Foreign Trade Policy, a relaxation or exemption for clubbing Advance Authorisations is discretionary and not a vested right. A request filed after the policy amendment of 5 June 2012 could not rely on Public Notice No. 79 of 13 October 2011, because the later clarification only preserved pending requests filed up to 4 June 2012; the rejection of clubbing was therefore upheld. The Policy Relaxation Committee was also competent to impose conditions while granting clubbing, since it may grant relaxation in genuine hardship or public interest and attach such conditions as it deems fit. The 48-month restriction and related conditions were sustained as valid incidents of the relaxation power.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2018 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 590 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345478</link>
      <description>Under the Foreign Trade Policy, a relaxation or exemption for clubbing Advance Authorisations is discretionary and not a vested right. A request filed after the policy amendment of 5 June 2012 could not rely on Public Notice No. 79 of 13 October 2011, because the later clarification only preserved pending requests filed up to 4 June 2012; the rejection of clubbing was therefore upheld. The Policy Relaxation Committee was also competent to impose conditions while granting clubbing, since it may grant relaxation in genuine hardship or public interest and attach such conditions as it deems fit. The 48-month restriction and related conditions were sustained as valid incidents of the relaxation power.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>