<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 587 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345475</link>
    <description>Under the advance licence scheme, differential customs duty was confined to the unfulfilled export obligation because Customs-verified DEEC entries and the earlier remand direction required proportional computation, and the absence of an EODC could not justify demand on the full import. Interest and penalty were also unsustainable because they had already been disallowed in the assessee&#039;s own case by the Supreme Court, leaving no surviving basis for those levies. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted only for verification of the duty calculation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 587 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345475</link>
      <description>Under the advance licence scheme, differential customs duty was confined to the unfulfilled export obligation because Customs-verified DEEC entries and the earlier remand direction required proportional computation, and the absence of an EODC could not justify demand on the full import. Interest and penalty were also unsustainable because they had already been disallowed in the assessee&#039;s own case by the Supreme Court, leaving no surviving basis for those levies. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted only for verification of the duty calculation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>