<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 586 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345474</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the finalization of provisionally assessed Shipping Bills at a higher value was unjustified as the Bills had been effectively finalized at the value declared by the appellant. The appellant was awarded interest on the excess duty paid, as per the Customs Act, 1962. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, entitling the appellant to interest from the date specified in the previous order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 10:18:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 586 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345474</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the finalization of provisionally assessed Shipping Bills at a higher value was unjustified as the Bills had been effectively finalized at the value declared by the appellant. The appellant was awarded interest on the excess duty paid, as per the Customs Act, 1962. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, entitling the appellant to interest from the date specified in the previous order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>