https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345472 The Tribunal upheld the decision to vacate the seizure of imported spares for a dredger, ruling that the importer did not intend to evade duty. The spares, although not initially declared, were acknowledged in the Import General Manifest's remarks column, indicating the intention to file a separate Bill of Entry. The Tribunal found no suppression of information and accepted the importer's explanation, affirming the legality of the impugned order and dismissing the appeal. en-us Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Dec 2017 17:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345472 The Tribunal upheld the decision to vacate the seizure of imported spares for a dredger, ruling that the importer did not intend to evade duty. The spares, although not initially declared, were acknowledged in the Import General Manifest's remarks column, indicating the intention to file a separate Bill of Entry. The Tribunal found no suppression of information and accepted the importer's explanation, affirming the legality of the impugned order and dismissing the appeal. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345472