<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 582 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345470</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals against the Tamilnadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s judgment for the Assessment Years 2000-01 and 2001-02. The issue centered on whether freight, cylinder charges, and handling charges should be part of the taxable turnover. The Tribunal found that these charges were not pre-sale expenses as they were separately shown in the sale bills. Citing a Kerala High Court judgment, it held that cylinder holding charges were not taxable unless effective control was transferred to customers. The appeals were dismissed, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the dealer-appellants stood.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 10:18:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 582 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345470</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals against the Tamilnadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s judgment for the Assessment Years 2000-01 and 2001-02. The issue centered on whether freight, cylinder charges, and handling charges should be part of the taxable turnover. The Tribunal found that these charges were not pre-sale expenses as they were separately shown in the sale bills. Citing a Kerala High Court judgment, it held that cylinder holding charges were not taxable unless effective control was transferred to customers. The appeals were dismissed, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the dealer-appellants stood.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>