<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1560 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193221</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing a recomputation of capital gain based on revised property values. The Tribunal found the valuation by the District Valuation Officer inappropriate due to the tenanted nature of the properties and unsuitable comparable instances. The Tribunal determined the property values differently from both the assessee&#039;s declaration and the DVO&#039;s valuation, instructing the Assessing Officer to recalculate the capital gain accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 10:16:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1560 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193221</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing a recomputation of capital gain based on revised property values. The Tribunal found the valuation by the District Valuation Officer inappropriate due to the tenanted nature of the properties and unsuitable comparable instances. The Tribunal determined the property values differently from both the assessee&#039;s declaration and the DVO&#039;s valuation, instructing the Assessing Officer to recalculate the capital gain accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>