<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 571 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345459</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the assessee did not conceal income but rather disclosed all relevant particulars regarding the transfer of assets. The explanation provided by the assessee that the transfer was a donation, not a sale, was considered plausible and supported by evidence. As a result, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:25:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 571 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345459</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the assessee did not conceal income but rather disclosed all relevant particulars regarding the transfer of assets. The explanation provided by the assessee that the transfer was a donation, not a sale, was considered plausible and supported by evidence. As a result, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was deleted, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>