<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 566 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345454</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the CIT(A) for reconsideration, directing a speaking order considering the appellant&#039;s submissions and a relevant CBDT circular. The appellant&#039;s challenges regarding disallowance of total addition, treatment of cash purchases, addition of purchases from specific parties, denial of deduction under section 80IC, failure to provide evidence, and lack of detailed consideration were all upheld for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:24:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 566 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345454</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the CIT(A) for reconsideration, directing a speaking order considering the appellant&#039;s submissions and a relevant CBDT circular. The appellant&#039;s challenges regarding disallowance of total addition, treatment of cash purchases, addition of purchases from specific parties, denial of deduction under section 80IC, failure to provide evidence, and lack of detailed consideration were all upheld for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>