<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 556 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345444</link>
    <description>The court upheld the demand for transportation/freight charges from 14.05.2003 to 2006-2007, including interest and equivalent penalty. However, the demand for the period before 14.05.2003 was not sustained. The issue of differential pricing was remanded for fresh adjudication. The demand, interest, and penalty related to commission agents were not upheld. The matter was remanded to the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) for re-quantification of duty demand, interest, and penalty. The appeal was disposed of accordingly on 04.07.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2018 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 556 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345444</link>
      <description>The court upheld the demand for transportation/freight charges from 14.05.2003 to 2006-2007, including interest and equivalent penalty. However, the demand for the period before 14.05.2003 was not sustained. The issue of differential pricing was remanded for fresh adjudication. The demand, interest, and penalty related to commission agents were not upheld. The matter was remanded to the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) for re-quantification of duty demand, interest, and penalty. The appeal was disposed of accordingly on 04.07.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>