<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 552 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345440</link>
    <description>The court quashed the Ext.P5 order confirming a demand of service tax and penalty due to non-compliance with natural justice principles. The petitioner&#039;s requests for adjournment and personal hearing were not considered, and the denial of cross-examination was also challenged. The court found that the order did not address the adjournment request, leading to a lack of consideration of the petitioner&#039;s submissions. Consequently, the court directed the respondent to issue fresh orders after affording the petitioner a chance to be heard and to cross-examine relevant individuals, ensuring a fair adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:23:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 552 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345440</link>
      <description>The court quashed the Ext.P5 order confirming a demand of service tax and penalty due to non-compliance with natural justice principles. The petitioner&#039;s requests for adjournment and personal hearing were not considered, and the denial of cross-examination was also challenged. The court found that the order did not address the adjournment request, leading to a lack of consideration of the petitioner&#039;s submissions. Consequently, the court directed the respondent to issue fresh orders after affording the petitioner a chance to be heard and to cross-examine relevant individuals, ensuring a fair adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>