https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345437 The Rectification of mistake application was allowed, correcting an error in the order dated 22.03.2017 regarding the provision for filing Cross objection before the Commissioner (Appeals). The judgment clarified that sub-section 4 of Section 129D of the Customs Act permits the filing of cross objections. The order was amended to emphasize the consideration of cross objection grounds, leading to the remand of the matter for a fresh decision by the Commissioner (Appeals). This decision ensured the correct interpretation and application of legal provisions concerning cross objections in the case. en-us Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 17:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345437 The Rectification of mistake application was allowed, correcting an error in the order dated 22.03.2017 regarding the provision for filing Cross objection before the Commissioner (Appeals). The judgment clarified that sub-section 4 of Section 129D of the Customs Act permits the filing of cross objections. The order was amended to emphasize the consideration of cross objection grounds, leading to the remand of the matter for a fresh decision by the Commissioner (Appeals). This decision ensured the correct interpretation and application of legal provisions concerning cross objections in the case. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345437