https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345431 Section 138 complaints earlier returned for want of territorial jurisdiction could be revived and re-registered after the 2015 amendments, because Section 142A, the amended jurisdiction scheme in Section 142, and the savings clause were treated as validating continuation of such proceedings. The prior cognizance, which had not been challenged when taken and was followed by appearance and bail, remained effective despite the return and re-presentation of the complaints, so the limitation objection also failed. A warrant-based summons order was not shown to be illegal where the accused had earlier failed to appear despite opportunity, though a short further chance to appear and furnish bail bonds was granted. en-us Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:22:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345431 Section 138 complaints earlier returned for want of territorial jurisdiction could be revived and re-registered after the 2015 amendments, because Section 142A, the amended jurisdiction scheme in Section 142, and the savings clause were treated as validating continuation of such proceedings. The prior cognizance, which had not been challenged when taken and was followed by appearance and bail, remained effective despite the return and re-presentation of the complaints, so the limitation objection also failed. A warrant-based summons order was not shown to be illegal where the accused had earlier failed to appear despite opportunity, though a short further chance to appear and furnish bail bonds was granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345431