<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (2) TMI 28 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9123</link>
    <description>Penalty under concealment provisions may be sustained where entries in a pocket note book, cross-checked with regular books and surrounding circumstances, show deliberate suppression of turnover not disclosed in the return. The stated material was treated as more than a mere rejection of the assessee&#039;s explanation, because the omission followed a surprise inspection and the concealment would not otherwise have been detected. On quantum, the penalty was considered justifiable because no mitigating circumstances were shown for reduction, and the assessment of penalty followed the governing Supreme Court authority on concealment cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (2) TMI 28 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9123</link>
      <description>Penalty under concealment provisions may be sustained where entries in a pocket note book, cross-checked with regular books and surrounding circumstances, show deliberate suppression of turnover not disclosed in the return. The stated material was treated as more than a mere rejection of the assessee&#039;s explanation, because the omission followed a surprise inspection and the concealment would not otherwise have been detected. On quantum, the penalty was considered justifiable because no mitigating circumstances were shown for reduction, and the assessment of penalty followed the governing Supreme Court authority on concealment cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>