https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193201 Section 6-H(2) permits only computation of a monetary benefit already established as due; it cannot be used to decide the antecedent dispute whether retrenchment in fact occurred. Because the employer denied retrenchment and the issue went to liability rather than mere calculation, the Labour Court lacked jurisdiction to award retrenchment compensation. The text also states that earned leave is a service incident dependent on the undertaking's continued operation, so no separate monetary compensation was payable for unavailed leave after closure in the absence of a specific statutory right. en-us Wed, 30 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Jul 2017 16:01:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193201 Section 6-H(2) permits only computation of a monetary benefit already established as due; it cannot be used to decide the antecedent dispute whether retrenchment in fact occurred. Because the employer denied retrenchment and the issue went to liability rather than mere calculation, the Labour Court lacked jurisdiction to award retrenchment compensation. The text also states that earned leave is a service incident dependent on the undertaking's continued operation, so no separate monetary compensation was payable for unavailed leave after closure in the absence of a specific statutory right. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 30 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193201