<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 542 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345430</link>
    <description>The Court directed that no coercive action be taken against lawyers or law firms for non-compliance with GST notifications until clarification is issued by the Central Government and GNCTD. Further hearings are required to consider interim directions due to the lack of clarity on the applicability of the reverse charge mechanism and registration requirements under the new GST laws for legal practitioners and firms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 542 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345430</link>
      <description>The Court directed that no coercive action be taken against lawyers or law firms for non-compliance with GST notifications until clarification is issued by the Central Government and GNCTD. Further hearings are required to consider interim directions due to the lack of clarity on the applicability of the reverse charge mechanism and registration requirements under the new GST laws for legal practitioners and firms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>