<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (9) TMI 66 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193200</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the deity&#039;s ownership of the suit lands, rejected the claim of a permanent lease under the 1851 arrangement, and dismissed the argument of adverse possession by the defendants. The plaintiff was granted possession of the lands, with the trial court tasked to assess mesne profits, and no costs were awarded throughout the legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 12:04:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (9) TMI 66 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193200</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the deity&#039;s ownership of the suit lands, rejected the claim of a permanent lease under the 1851 arrangement, and dismissed the argument of adverse possession by the defendants. The plaintiff was granted possession of the lands, with the trial court tasked to assess mesne profits, and no costs were awarded throughout the legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>