<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 536 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345424</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order on both issues. The freight charges were not disallowed under Section 40(a)(ia) due to the inapplicability of Section 194C, and the profit from the sale of land was correctly computed under &#039;business income,&#039; excluding the application of Section 50C.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:47:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 536 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345424</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order on both issues. The freight charges were not disallowed under Section 40(a)(ia) due to the inapplicability of Section 194C, and the profit from the sale of land was correctly computed under &#039;business income,&#039; excluding the application of Section 50C.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345424</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>