<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 534 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345422</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the appointments of R2 as Managing Director and R3 as Director to be illegal due to lack of proper procedures. The issue and allotment of further shares without following statutory requirements were deemed oppressive, reducing the petitioner&#039;s shareholding. The respondents&#039; mismanagement and failure to comply with legal obligations led to a ruling of oppression and mismanagement. The Tribunal ordered the reversal of capital changes, share allotments, and appointments, along with an independent audit at the respondents&#039; expense. The petition was allowed, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 534 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345422</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the appointments of R2 as Managing Director and R3 as Director to be illegal due to lack of proper procedures. The issue and allotment of further shares without following statutory requirements were deemed oppressive, reducing the petitioner&#039;s shareholding. The respondents&#039; mismanagement and failure to comply with legal obligations led to a ruling of oppression and mismanagement. The Tribunal ordered the reversal of capital changes, share allotments, and appointments, along with an independent audit at the respondents&#039; expense. The petition was allowed, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>