<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 529 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345417</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the importance of providing the assessee with the opportunity to opt for a reduced penalty within the prescribed period. Failure to offer this option should result in granting the facility of paying the reduced penalty upon fulfilling the conditions within the specified timeframe. The tax appeal was ultimately dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s stance on the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=481546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 529 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345417</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, emphasizing the importance of providing the assessee with the opportunity to opt for a reduced penalty within the prescribed period. Failure to offer this option should result in granting the facility of paying the reduced penalty upon fulfilling the conditions within the specified timeframe. The tax appeal was ultimately dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s stance on the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>